Thursday, June 18, 2015

Is the IRS Going Out of Business?

         I got on the elevator at my office this morning with a little white dog. It was pouring rain and it had a tiny blue raincoat on. I tried to decide whether it was a service dog but it didn’t look like it was doing anything except shaking off the rain. The owner was a young guy who was trying to shed the rain off his coat as well. I couldn’t resist asking him what the dog was doing here. “It’s for morale” he said. “Oh, well that’s important” I said. I was dripping wet also. I had come in with the intention of dictating this bar bulletin. That tiny dog gave me my intro. In the last few months the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has been telling Congress that the agency is basically going broke. Audit examinations are declining quickly. Last year’s overall exam rate was a tiny .86% which means one out of every 116 tax returns. The IRS performed less than 160,000 fewer audits in 2014 than they did in 2013. And it gets worse. The IRS audit staff has been reduced by more than 600 revenue agents. That’s where the little dog came in. What is it like these days to be working for an agency that doesn’t seem to have the support of the U.S. Congress? When staff is reduced the remaining agents are expected to pick up the slack. Of course human nature drives down morale when this happens. By the way the drop in examination coverage applies to all income classes. For tax filers with income under $200,000 it’s a drop of 12%. With no statistics it’s clear that the audit rate for business returns has also declined. It’s hard to imagine that audit rates have been significantly lower in prior years. Back in 2000 only .49% of all individual tax returns were examined that’s less than one in 200. When IRS does the calculation of its audit rates however it only counts in person exams and correspondence audits by service centers. Many more taxpayers get notices from IRS about mismatches in their 1099s and W-2 information. But the reality is the morale at the service must be terrible. Should you have occasion to discuss a client’s tax case with an agent, you’ll see for yourself. What it means is agents will most likely not have as much heart in their job and that smaller cases will probably not be pursued. The agency is requesting an additional $2 billion for fiscal year 2016 but given the Republican controlled House and Senate it doesn’t look like the IRS will be getting much of an increase. I wonder if that little dog would mind commuting to Washington DC. You know morale is important.

What to Consider if You are Hiding from the IRS: Voluntary Disclosure

Revised IRS Voluntary Disclosure Practice

 

TAX CRIMES - GENERAL
IRM 9.5.11.9
Voluntary Disclosure Practice
(1)  It is currently the practice of the IRS that a voluntary disclosure will be considered along with all other factors in the investigation in determining whether criminal prosecution will be recommended.  This voluntary disclosure practice creates no substantive or procedural rights for taxpayers, but rather is a matter of internal IRS practice, provided solely for guidance to IRS personnel.  Taxpayers cannot rely on the fact that other similarly situated taxpayers may not have been recommended for criminal prosecution.
(2)  A voluntary disclosure will not automatically guarantee immunity from  prosecution; however, a voluntary disclosure may result in prosecution not being recommended.  This practice does not apply to taxpayers with illegal source income.
(3)  A voluntary disclosure occurs when the communication is truthful, timely, complete, and when:
a.  the taxpayer shows a willingness to cooperate (and  does in fact cooperate) with the IRS in determining his or her correct tax liability; and
b.   the taxpayer makes good faith arrangements with the IRS to pay in full, the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable.
(4) A disclosure is timely if it is received before:
a.  the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation of the taxpayer, or has notified the taxpayer that it intends to commence such an examination or investigation;
b.  the IRS has received information from a third party (e.g., informant, other governmental agency, or the media) alerting the IRS to the specific taxpayer’s noncompliance;
c.  the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation which is directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer; or
d.  the IRS has acquired information directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer from a criminal enforcement action (e.g., search warrant, grand jury subpoena).
(5)  Any taxpayer who contacts the IRS in person or through a representative regarding voluntary disclosure will be directed to Criminal Investigation for evaluation of the disclosure.  Special agents are encouraged to consult Area Counsel, Criminal Tax on voluntary disclosure issues.
(6)  Examples of voluntary disclosures include:
a.  a letter from an attorney which encloses amended returns from a client which are complete and accurate (reporting legal source income omitted from the original returns), which offers to pay the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable in full and which meets the timeliness standard set forth above.  This is a voluntary disclosure because all elements of (3), above are met.
b.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer of omitted income facilitated through a barter exchange after the IRS has announced that it has begun a civil compliance project targeting barter exchanges; however the IRS has not yet commenced an examination or investigation of the taxpayer or notified the taxpayer of its intention to do so.  In addition, the taxpayer files complete and accurate amended returns and makes arrangements with the IRS to pay in full, the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable.  This is a voluntary disclosure because the civil compliance project involving barter exchanges does not yet directly relate to the specific liability of the taxpayer and  because all other elements of (3), above are met
c.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer of omitted income facilitated through a widely promoted scheme regarding which the IRS has begun a civil compliance project and already obtained information which might lead to an examination of the taxpayer; however, the IRS has not yet commenced an examination or investigation of the taxpayer or notified the taxpayer of its intent to do so.  In addition, the  taxpayer files complete and accurate returns and makes arrangements with the IRS to pay in full, the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable.  This is a voluntary disclosure because the civil compliance project involving the scheme does not yet directly relate to the specific liability of the taxpayer and because all other elements of (3), above are met.
d.  A disclosure made by an individual who has not filed tax returns after the individual has received a notice stating that the IRS has no record of receiving a return for a particular year and inquiring into whether the taxpayer filed a return for that year.  The individual files complete and accurate returns and makes arrangements with the IRS to pay the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable in full.  This is a voluntary disclosure because the IRS has not yet commenced an examination or investigation of the taxpayer or notified the taxpayer of its intent to do so and because all other elements of (3), above, are met.
(7) Examples of what are not voluntary disclosures include:
a.  a letter from an attorney stating his or her client, who wishes to remain anonymous, wants to resolve his or her tax liability. This is not a voluntary disclosure until the identity of the taxpayer is disclosed and all other elements of (3) above have been met.
b.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer who is under grand jury investigation.  This is not a voluntary disclosure because the taxpayer is already under criminal investigation.  The conclusion would be the same whether or not the taxpayer knew of the grand jury investigation.
c.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer, who is not currently under examination or investigation, of omitted gross receipts from a partnership, but whose partner is already under investigation for omitted income skimmed from the partnership.  This is not a voluntary disclosure because the IRS has already initiated an investigation which is directly related to the specific liability of this taxpayer.  The conclusion would be the same whether or not the taxpayer knew of the ongoing investigation.
d.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer, who is not currently under examination or investigation, of omitted constructive dividends received from a corporation which is currently  under examination.  This is not a voluntary disclosure because the IRS has already initiated an examination which is directly related to the specific liability of this taxpayer.  The conclusion would be the same whether or not the taxpayer knew of the ongoing examination.
e.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer after an employee has contacted the IRS regarding the taxpayer's double set of books.  This is not a voluntary disclosure even if no examination or investigation has yet commenced because the IRS has already been informed by the third party of the specific taxpayer's noncompliance.  The conclusion would be the same whether or