Sometimes the Internal Revenue Code has a heart. While
the law makes clear that income is taxable from whatever source derived both
legal and illegal, Congress in its wisdom created some specific exclusions. It
really seems unfair to tax someone who was had physical injuries and receives a
legal settlement for them. Those payments are designed to render the injured
plaintiff whole again. The thinking may be also that physical injury is
preventing them from returning to work. Every year there are numerous tax cases
trying to determine whether or not physical injury is involved. While the code goes easy on physical injury
it makes payments for emotional distress taxable. The wisdom here may be a
little cloudy but the tax law is not. Of course things can be muddy when one
award is made for both physical and emotional injuries or when there is a
connection between them. Consider the case of Barbato, TC memo 2016 – 23.
In that case a woman suffered actual physical injuries. But the lawsuit that
was brought on her behalf claimed that her employer had discriminated against
her because she had requested medical accommodation for a prior workplace
injury. So the question became was the award for the discrimination
sufficiently connected to the physical injury to be excludable? The Tax Court
refused to make the connection and held that the payments for the emotional
distress were taxable. Litigation lawyers are wise to pay close attention to
what they are suing for and alleging in any complaint or petition filed on
behalf of their clients as it may dictate the extent that the proceeds will be
taxable.
No comments:
Post a Comment