I have a file for recommendations to
law school. It’s done on a fancy form now a lot more sophisticated than the old
days, but in many ways it asks the same questions. How do you know this
candidate? Is there anything that makes them particularly suited to study the
law? And on and on and so forth. What it does not ask is whether the person
making the recommendation has set the candidate down and read them the Riot
Act. Not so much about how difficult it will be to find a rewarding position
and the magnitude of the debt that may be facing them when they are finally out
of law school, but one more basic. When my old college roommate’s daughter
decided to go to law school I gave her this advice: If you become a lawyer you
will never be the same. Let me tell you what I meant. Last week friends invited
me to go with them to see a new movie that had made some top billings at film
festivals out West. It was called “The Biggest Little Farm.” Now to non-lawyers, it is a sweet film about
overcoming obstacles and realizing an almost unobtainable dream. In this case
going from being evicted from their apartment because of their loving dog Todd
(An expressive rescue doe eyed canine) in Los Angeles to acquiring a 200 acre
farm an hour north and turning it into a sustainable, organic piece of
paradise. I could hear sobs from some of the people in the audience. I will
confess that some of the scenes including the one involving the birth of
seventeen piglets were touching and Kleenex worthy. But as I sat there my two
law degrees and 45 years of practice including a stint with the Internal
Revenue Service began to surface. The chief characters John and Molly both had
incomes of a sort. He being a photographer and she owning her own small
business. The eviction was not because they were broke, but because of their
dog. But still how could these young people swing owning 200 acres north of Los
Angeles? The movie off offhandedly mentions the word “investors.” That did it for
me. It brought back memories of tax shelters from the 1970's where investors
were eager to pony up their money even if they lost their investment because
they were more than covered with beneficent tax deductions. In the most
egregious examples with a multiple of their original purchase price. My mind
wandered to my days in the US Tax Court where movies were the schemes upon
which tax shelters were built as well as oil wells, silver mines, cattle,
Caribbean yachts and the like. Instead of paying attention to the human side of
what I was viewing, I was picturing the prospectus that had been prepared by
some fancy law firm in Los Angeles chock full of tax law promises. Further, I
was intrigued by whether or not this activity would be considered active or
passive for the many rules disallowing real estate deductions. Could IRS
challenge any tax deductions because this was a hobby venture with little
potential for profit? This was never my field and I was considering at the time
calling one of my colleagues the next day and reviewing those very rules. John
and Molly in the movie had stars in their eyes; they used their talents coupled
with hard work to make the farm a reality. You can see it for yourself, it’s
called “Apricot Lanes Farm” in California. I did some research when I got home
and concluded none of what I had legally fantasized was probably true. I guess
if you are a real estate lawyer you would be intrigued by the various riparian
rights issues. If divorce and family law is your game you would be questioning
why these young people have not entered into well advised pre-or post-nuptial
agreements. Injury lawyers would be gasping at some of the farm tractor antics.
Land use, animal rights practitioners, civil rights lawyers and gun-control
advocates would find elements here to also be concerned for. I think you get
the point by now. We lawyers are a strange group; our brains permanently
reorganized to consider facts critically and to weigh rights and liabilities.
Normal people don’t do that. They just go to a movie and enjoy the show. I
can’t help but wonder if we lawyers can be reprogrammed perhaps at retirement.
I thought about writing the law school admission people to suggest that their
law school application should contain a warning perhaps from the Surgeon
General: Law School May Be Dangerous to
Your Health and Attitude.
No comments:
Post a Comment